No. It is not "more economical" with traditional means - reason being that it 1) cannot be shot down and 2) is high precision without being an ICBM 3) can penetrate hardened Soviet buildings
Traditional means are less high precision, cannot penetrate hardened structures and can be shot down
No. It is not "more economical" with traditional means - reason being that it 1) cannot be shot down and 2) is high precision without being an ICBM 3) can penetrate hardened Soviet buildings
Traditional means are less high precision, cannot penetrate hardened structures and can be shot down
No. It is not "more economical" with traditional means - reason being that it 1) cannot be shot down and 2) is high precision without being an ICBM 3) can penetrate hardened Soviet buildings
Traditional means are less high precision, cannot penetrate hardened structures and can be shot down
Your claims that a Khinzhal can be shot down and is low precision are false, making everything you wrote false or not appliccable.